Difference between revisions of "Hypertwins Community:Plans"
(Friendica bugs) |
(NBP->BSP) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am considering offering a number of web/internet services, either for free or using [[ | I am considering offering a number of web/internet services, either for free or using [[buyer-set pricing]] (depending on the service). | ||
==Advantages== | ==Advantages== | ||
Obviously these services are all available elsewhere, but I'm thinking I could offer a number of improvements over the alternatives. | Obviously these services are all available elsewhere, but I'm thinking I could offer a number of improvements over the alternatives. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* '''NOP''': revenue would not support the plutonomy (or would support it a lot less than simply doing business directly with it) | * '''NOP''': revenue would not support the plutonomy (or would support it a lot less than simply doing business directly with it) | ||
* '''NOA''': No Anschluss -- user would be in complete control of which of their accounts to link together | * '''NOA''': No Anschluss -- user would be in complete control of which of their accounts to link together | ||
* ''' | * '''BSP''': [[buyer-set pricing]] | ||
All specialized code used to integrate these services would be made open source as well, so that others could set up their own nodes. I want this to be a replicable business model. | All specialized code used to integrate these services would be made open source as well, so that others could set up their own nodes. I want this to be a replicable business model. | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| {{l/wp|Google Drive}}, [[wikipedia:Dropbox (service)|Dropbox]] | | {{l/wp|Google Drive}}, [[wikipedia:Dropbox (service)|Dropbox]] | ||
| {{l/wp|ownCloud}} | | {{l/wp|ownCloud}} | ||
| NOP, NOA, | | NOP, NOA, BSP for more than default capacity | ||
| storage costs money (though not much) | | storage costs money (though not much) | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| {{l/htyp|GoDaddy}}, {{l/htyp|HostGator}}, {{l/wp|BlueHost}}, etc. | | {{l/htyp|GoDaddy}}, {{l/htyp|HostGator}}, {{l/wp|BlueHost}}, etc. | ||
| {{l/wp|Virtualmin}} / {{l/wp|Usermin}} | | {{l/wp|Virtualmin}} / {{l/wp|Usermin}} | ||
| NOP, NOA, | | NOP, NOA, BSP | ||
| usability of existing software needs to be explored | | usability of existing software needs to be explored | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
==More Information== | ==More Information== | ||
Some of the links on this page go to other pages on this site in order to explain various things at leisure; here's a list: | Some of the links on this page go to other pages on this site in order to explain various things at leisure; here's a list: | ||
* [[ | * [[buyer-set pricing]] | ||
* [[/email hosting]] | * [[/email hosting]] | ||
* [[/media hosting]] | * [[/media hosting]] |
Revision as of 02:04, 20 December 2014
I am considering offering a number of web/internet services, either for free or using buyer-set pricing (depending on the service).
Advantages
Obviously these services are all available elsewhere, but I'm thinking I could offer a number of improvements over the alternatives.
The following would be true for many/most of these services, so I'll use abbreviations to indicate where they apply:
- DDN: designed as part of a distributed network, with multiple nodes inter-operating from different domains -- nobody would "own" the network
- NOP: revenue would not support the plutonomy (or would support it a lot less than simply doing business directly with it)
- NOA: No Anschluss -- user would be in complete control of which of their accounts to link together
- BSP: buyer-set pricing
All specialized code used to integrate these services would be made open source as well, so that others could set up their own nodes. I want this to be a replicable business model.
Obstacles
Although there is already open-source software for most of these services, some considerable code would need to be written to allow single-sign-on. However, since the mass automatic integration of services on Google is considered a problem by many, the lack of such integration here will probably be seen as an advantage by many as well.
Services
Service | Similar to | Possible software | Main Advantages | Main Obstacles |
---|---|---|---|---|
cloud storage | Google Drive, Dropbox | ownCloud | NOP, NOA, BSP for more than default capacity | storage costs money (though not much) |
search engine | Google, Yahoo!, Bing | YaCy | DDN, NOP, no tracking or automatic "personalization" | easy - no major modification or integration needed |
social networking | Google+, Facebook | Friendica | DDN, NOP, NOA |
|
retail service | Amazon Marketplace, Etsy, Ebay | VbzCart | DDN, NOP, plan to be responsive to buyer/seller needs | much code remains to be written to make this a service and distributed |
media hosting | YouTube, Vimeo, Soundcloud (audio) | details |
|
integration coding |
email hosting | GMail, Yahoo! Mail, etc. | details | NOP, NOA |
|
web hosting | GoDaddy, HostGator, BlueHost, etc. | Virtualmin / Usermin | NOP, NOA, BSP | usability of existing software needs to be explored |
Revenue
The revenue model Google seems to be following is that once you have gotten someone's attention (by offering them various free services which they then use regularly), they're more likely to buy things from you or through you even if you don't directly ask them to (as in banner ads). In other words, they create their own micro-economy, from which they gain by being the broker for various transactions (for which they are also sometimes the seller).
My plan is to use a similar model, but to avoid Google's centralization (which is ultimately what caused them to stray from their "don't be evil" credo).
Goals - long-term
- undercut hierarchical big chain model
- undercut centralized web services
- out-perform profit-driven services
- create interoperable mini-economies
- experiment with new ways of conducting economic transactions
- participant-backed monetary system
- e.g. sellers could back their currency with stock
- other users offer credit based on personal trust, like RipplePay
- microcredits for any valued form of participation, e.g. writing popular post or uploading popular video
- participant-backed monetary system
- when profits are sufficient, use excess to do the things that government should be doing but increasingly is not:
- provide for the needy, defend the underprivileged, work towards unconditional income
- fund scientific research, make the results freely available
- provide sources of undoctored information; vet existing sources for reliability
- (this will probably be a much longer list, eventually)
Back Burner
To be expanded on later:
- audio/video streaming
- photo album (should be available standalone or as feature of social networking)
- liquid agenda
- money account tracking / contribution tracker
- project management (like Redmine)
- public service bounty tracker
- wikis?
- Minecraft server -- just because I know some people who want one
- Kune? Going to set this up to see what it can do.
More Information
Some of the links on this page go to other pages on this site in order to explain various things at leisure; here's a list: